src/test/resources/__files/chatGptRunStepsResponse.json

{
  "object": "list",
  "data": [
    {
      "id": "step_TEST_STEP_ID",
      "object": "thread.run.step",
      "status": "completed",
      "created_at": 1714983398.0,
      "run_id": "run_TEST_RUN_ID",
      "assistant_id": "asst_TEST_ASSISTANT_ID",
      "thread_id": "thread_TEST_THREAD_ID",
      "type": "tool_calls",
      "step_details": {
        "type": "tool_calls",
        "tool_calls": [
          {
            "id": "call_8xIUWZjqjw4UKJOY58jmINKX",
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
              "name": "format_replies",
              "arguments": "{\n                \"replies\": [\n                  {\n                    \"reply\": \"The change in the `rsplit` function call from `rsplit('.', 1)` to `rsplit('.', 2)` might lead to a `ValueError` if the `module_name` does not contain any dots. This change assumes that there is always at least one dot in the `module_name`. Ensure that the module naming convention enforces this or add error handling for the case where `module_name` does not contain a dot.\",\n                    \"score\": -1,\n                    \"relevance\": 0.9,\n                    \"repeated\": false,\n                    \"conflicting\": false,\n                    \"filename\": \"test_file_1.py\",\n                    \"lineNumber\": 18,\n                    \"codeSnippet\": \"module_name, class_name = module_name.rsplit('.', 2)\"\n                  }\n                ],\n                \"changeId\": \"myProject~myBranchName~myChangeId\"\n              }"
            }
          },
          {
            "id": "call_M1ioOSrg4sDZ3Q8Tps6dcAJk",
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
              "name": "format_replies",
              "arguments": "{\n                \"replies\": [\n                  {\n                    \"reply\": \"The commit message 'Minor Fixes' is too vague and does not provide adequate information about the changes made in the PatchSet. A more descriptive message would help understand the nature and objective of the changes. Please consider revising it to include details of what is being fixed and why.\",\n                    \"score\": -1,\n                    \"relevance\": 0.8,\n                    \"repeated\": false,\n                    \"conflicting\": false\n                  }\n                ],\n                \"changeId\": \"myProject~myBranchName~myChangeId\"\n              }"
            }
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  ]
}