commit | 7e23cd08d33f45781f29cb718bcbdb5923f60464 | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> | Thu Jun 18 11:40:18 2015 -0700 |
committer | Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> | Thu Jun 18 11:45:30 2015 -0700 |
tree | ab9e6f4484634d8b3c0996638a3e7287fe102881 | |
parent | 3e8bd6e30ddb35e5eba3a067528bcd6e6d68b10f [diff] |
Related Changes: Additionally add black dot based on state It used to be the case that the (!info.hasChangeNumber() || !info.hasRevisionNumber())) triggered on merged or abandoned changes. This is not the case any more for all merged and abandoned changes, so we need to transport depend on the state of the change directly to also mark those changes, not covered by the condition as above. Change-Id: I08f97c844d8981a3b400705108e494570d25fc78