Merge "RevisionCreated: Reuse existing ChangeData"
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/restapi/change/Submit.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/restapi/change/Submit.java
index 36b859c..0a47d62 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/restapi/change/Submit.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/restapi/change/Submit.java
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
package com.google.gerrit.server.restapi.change;
+import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;
import static com.google.gerrit.git.ObjectIds.abbreviateName;
import static com.google.gerrit.server.project.ProjectCache.illegalState;
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.joining;
@@ -71,10 +72,10 @@
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
-import java.util.EnumSet;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
import org.eclipse.jgit.errors.ConfigInvalidException;
@@ -99,8 +100,6 @@
"Submit all ${topicSize} changes of the same topic "
+ "(${submitSize} changes including ancestors and other "
+ "changes related by topic)";
- private static final String BLOCKED_HIDDEN_SUBMIT_TOOLTIP =
- "This change depends on other hidden changes which are not ready";
private static final String CLICK_FAILURE_TOOLTIP = "Clicking the button would fail";
private static final String CHANGE_UNMERGEABLE = "Problems with integrating this change";
@@ -240,48 +239,15 @@
*/
@Nullable
private String problemsForSubmittingChangeset(ChangeData cd, ChangeSet cs, CurrentUser user) {
- try {
- if (cs.furtherHiddenChanges()) {
- logger.atFine().log(
- "Change %d cannot be submitted by user %s because it depends on hidden changes: %s",
- cd.getId().get(), user.getLoggableName(), cs.nonVisibleChanges());
- return BLOCKED_HIDDEN_SUBMIT_TOOLTIP;
- }
- for (ChangeData c : cs.changes()) {
- Set<ChangePermission> can =
- permissionBackend
- .user(user)
- .change(c)
- .test(EnumSet.of(ChangePermission.READ, ChangePermission.SUBMIT));
- if (!can.contains(ChangePermission.READ)) {
- logger.atFine().log(
- "Change %d cannot be submitted by user %s because it depends on change %d which the user cannot read",
- cd.getId().get(), user.getLoggableName(), c.getId().get());
- return BLOCKED_HIDDEN_SUBMIT_TOOLTIP;
- }
- if (!can.contains(ChangePermission.SUBMIT)) {
- return "You don't have permission to submit change " + c.getId();
- }
- if (c.change().isWorkInProgress()) {
- return "Change " + c.getId() + " is marked work in progress";
- }
- try {
- // The data in the change index may be stale (e.g. if submit requirements have been
- // changed). For that one change for which the submit action is computed, use the
- // freshly loaded ChangeData instance 'cd' instead of the potentially stale ChangeData
- // instance 'c' that was loaded from the index. This makes a difference if the ChangeSet
- // 'cs' only contains this one single change. If the ChangeSet contains further changes
- // those may still be stale.
- MergeOp.checkSubmitRequirements(cd.getId().equals(c.getId()) ? cd : c);
- } catch (ResourceConflictException e) {
- return (c.getId() == cd.getId())
- ? String.format("Change %s is not ready: %s", cd.getId(), e.getMessage())
- : String.format(
- "Change %s must be submitted with change %s but %s is not ready: %s",
- cd.getId(), c.getId(), c.getId(), e.getMessage());
- }
- }
+ Optional<String> reason =
+ MergeOp.checkCommonSubmitProblems(cd.change(), cs, false, permissionBackend, user).stream()
+ .findFirst()
+ .map(MergeOp.ChangeProblem::getProblem);
+ if (reason.isPresent()) {
+ return reason.get();
+ }
+ try {
if (!useMergeabilityCheck) {
return null;
}
@@ -298,7 +264,7 @@
return "Problems with change(s): "
+ unmergeable.stream().map(c -> c.getId().toString()).collect(joining(", "));
}
- } catch (PermissionBackendException | IOException e) {
+ } catch (IOException e) {
logger.atSevere().withCause(e).log("Error checking if change is submittable");
throw new StorageException("Could not determine problems for the change", e);
}
@@ -331,6 +297,15 @@
mergeSuperSet
.get()
.completeChangeSet(cd.change(), resource.getUser(), /*includingTopicClosure= */ false);
+ // Replace potentially stale ChangeData for the current change with the fresher one.
+ cs =
+ new ChangeSet(
+ cs.changes().stream()
+ .map(csChange -> csChange.getId().equals(cd.getId()) ? cd : csChange)
+ .collect(toImmutableList()),
+ cs.nonVisibleChanges());
+ String submitProblems = problemsForSubmittingChangeset(cd, cs, resource.getUser());
+
String topic = change.getTopic();
int topicSize = 0;
if (!Strings.isNullOrEmpty(topic)) {
@@ -338,8 +313,6 @@
}
boolean treatWithTopic = submitWholeTopic && !Strings.isNullOrEmpty(topic) && topicSize > 1;
- String submitProblems = problemsForSubmittingChangeset(cd, cs, resource.getUser());
-
if (submitProblems != null) {
return new UiAction.Description()
.setLabel(treatWithTopic ? submitTopicLabel : (cs.size() > 1) ? labelWithParents : label)
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeMetrics.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeMetrics.java
index b56d9ef..ed07f2f 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeMetrics.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeMetrics.java
@@ -54,32 +54,36 @@
.setRate());
}
- public void countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval(ChangeData cd) {
- if (isRebaseOnBehalfOfUploader(cd)
- && hasCodeReviewApprovalOfRealUploader(cd)
- && !hasCodeReviewApprovalOfUserThatIsNotTheRealUploader(cd)
- && ignoresCodeReviewApprovalsOfUploader(cd)) {
- // 1. The patch set that is being submitted was created by rebasing on behalf of the uploader.
- // The uploader of the patch set is the original uploader on whom's behalf the rebase was
- // done. The real uploader is the user that did the rebase on behalf of the uploader (e.g. by
- // clicking on the rebase button).
- //
- // 2. The change has a Code-Review approval of the real uploader (aka the rebaser).
- //
- // 3. The change doesn't have a Code-Review approval of any other user (a user that is not the
- // real uploader).
- //
- // 4. Code-Review approvals of the uploader are ignored.
- //
- // If instead of a rebase on behalf of the uploader a normal rebase would have been done the
- // rebaser would have been the uploader of the patch set. In this case the Code-Review
- // approval of the rebaser would not have counted since Code-Review approvals of the uploader
- // are ignored.
- //
- // In this case we assume that the change would not be submittable if a normal rebase had been
- // done. This is not always correct (e.g. if there are approvals of multiple reviewers) but
- // it's good enough for the metric.
- countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval.increment();
+ public void countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval(ChangeSet cs) {
+ for (ChangeData cd : cs.changes()) {
+ if (isRebaseOnBehalfOfUploader(cd)
+ && hasCodeReviewApprovalOfRealUploader(cd)
+ && !hasCodeReviewApprovalOfUserThatIsNotTheRealUploader(cd)
+ && ignoresCodeReviewApprovalsOfUploader(cd)) {
+ // 1. The patch set that is being submitted was created by rebasing on behalf of the
+ // uploader.
+ //
+ // The uploader of the patch set is the original uploader on whose behalf the rebase was
+ // done. The real uploader is the user that did the rebase on behalf of the uploader (e.g.
+ // by clicking on the rebase button).
+ //
+ // 2. The change has a Code-Review approval of the real uploader (aka the rebaser).
+ //
+ // 3. The change doesn't have a Code-Review approval of any other user (a user that is not
+ // the real uploader).
+ //
+ // 4. Code-Review approvals of the uploader are ignored.
+ //
+ // If instead of a rebase on behalf of the uploader a normal rebase would have been done the
+ // rebaser would have been the uploader of the patch set. In this case the Code-Review
+ // approval of the rebaser would not have counted since Code-Review approvals of the
+ // uploader are ignored.
+ //
+ // In this case we assume that the change would not be submittable if a normal rebase had
+ // been done. This is not always correct (e.g. if there are approvals of multiple reviewers)
+ // but it's good enough for the metric.
+ countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval.increment();
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeOp.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeOp.java
index eb41690..233f00e 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeOp.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/submit/MergeOp.java
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
import com.google.gerrit.metrics.MetricMaker;
import com.google.gerrit.server.ChangeMessagesUtil;
import com.google.gerrit.server.ChangeUtil;
+import com.google.gerrit.server.CurrentUser;
import com.google.gerrit.server.IdentifiedUser;
import com.google.gerrit.server.InternalUser;
import com.google.gerrit.server.change.NotifyResolver;
@@ -83,6 +84,8 @@
import com.google.gerrit.server.logging.TraceContext;
import com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ChangeNotes;
import com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.StoreSubmitRequirementsOp;
+import com.google.gerrit.server.permissions.ChangePermission;
+import com.google.gerrit.server.permissions.PermissionBackend;
import com.google.gerrit.server.permissions.PermissionBackendException;
import com.google.gerrit.server.project.NoSuchProjectException;
import com.google.gerrit.server.project.ProjectCache;
@@ -112,6 +115,7 @@
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Deque;
+import java.util.EnumSet;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
@@ -292,6 +296,7 @@
private final ChangeData.Factory changeDataFactory;
private final StoreSubmitRequirementsOp.Factory storeSubmitRequirementsOpFactory;
private final MergeMetrics mergeMetrics;
+ private final PermissionBackend permissionBackend;
// Changes that were updated by this MergeOp.
private final Map<Change.Id, Change> updatedChanges;
@@ -336,7 +341,8 @@
MergeMetrics mergeMetrics,
ProjectCache projectCache,
ExperimentFeatures experimentFeatures,
- @GerritServerConfig Config config) {
+ @GerritServerConfig Config config,
+ PermissionBackend permissionBackend) {
this.cmUtil = cmUtil;
this.batchUpdateFactory = batchUpdateFactory;
this.batchUpdates = batchUpdates;
@@ -362,6 +368,7 @@
hasImplicitMergeTimeoutSeconds =
ConfigUtil.getTimeUnit(
config, "change", null, "implicitMergeCalculationTimeout", 60, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ this.permissionBackend = permissionBackend;
}
@Override
@@ -371,6 +378,12 @@
}
}
+ /**
+ * Check that SRs are fulfilled or throw otherwise
+ *
+ * @param cd change that is being checked
+ * @throws ResourceConflictException the exception that is thrown if the SR is not fulfilled
+ */
public static void checkSubmitRequirements(ChangeData cd) throws ResourceConflictException {
PatchSet patchSet = cd.currentPatchSet();
if (patchSet == null) {
@@ -425,32 +438,119 @@
return cd.submitRecords(submitRuleOptions(/* allowClosed= */ false));
}
- private void checkSubmitRulesAndState(ChangeSet cs, boolean allowMerged)
- throws ResourceConflictException {
- checkArgument(
- !cs.furtherHiddenChanges(), "checkSubmitRulesAndState called for topic with hidden change");
+ @AutoValue
+ public abstract static class ChangeProblem {
+ public abstract Change.Id getChangeId();
+
+ public abstract String getProblem();
+
+ public static ChangeProblem create(Change.Id changeId, String problem) {
+ return new AutoValue_MergeOp_ChangeProblem(changeId, problem);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns a list of messages describing what prevents the current change from being submitted.
+ *
+ * <p>The method checks all changes in the {@code cs} for their current status, submitability and
+ * permissions.
+ *
+ * @param triggeringChange Change for which merge/submit action was initiated
+ * @param cs Set of changes that the current change depends on
+ * @param allowMerged True if change being already merged is not a problem to be reported
+ * @param permissionBackend Interface for checking user ACLs
+ * @param caller The user who is triggering a merge
+ * @return List of problems preventing merge
+ */
+ public static ImmutableList<ChangeProblem> checkCommonSubmitProblems(
+ Change triggeringChange,
+ ChangeSet cs,
+ boolean allowMerged,
+ PermissionBackend permissionBackend,
+ CurrentUser caller) {
+ ImmutableList.Builder<ChangeProblem> problems = ImmutableList.builder();
+ if (cs.furtherHiddenChanges()) {
+ logger.atFine().log(
+ "Change %d cannot be submitted by user %s because it depends on hidden changes: %s",
+ triggeringChange.getId().get(), caller.getLoggableName(), cs.nonVisibleChanges());
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ triggeringChange.getId(),
+ String.format(
+ "Change %d depends on other hidden changes", triggeringChange.getId().get())));
+ }
for (ChangeData cd : cs.changes()) {
try {
- if (!cd.change().isNew()) {
+ Set<ChangePermission> can =
+ permissionBackend
+ .user(caller)
+ .change(cd)
+ .test(EnumSet.of(ChangePermission.READ, ChangePermission.SUBMIT));
+ if (!can.contains(ChangePermission.READ)) {
+ // The READ permission should already be handled during generation of ChangeSet, however
+ // MergeSuperSetComputation is an interface and on API level doesn't guarantee that this
+ // have been verified for all changes. Additionally, this protects against potential
+ // issues due to staleness.
+ logger.atFine().log(
+ "Change %d cannot be submitted by user %s because it depends on change %d which the"
+ + "user cannot read",
+ triggeringChange.getId().get(), caller.getLoggableName(), cd.getId().get());
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ cd.getId(),
+ String.format(
+ "Change %d depends on other hidden changes",
+ triggeringChange.getId().get())));
+ } else if (!can.contains(ChangePermission.SUBMIT)) {
+ logger.atFine().log(
+ "Change %d cannot be submitted by user %s because it depends on change %d which the"
+ + "user cannot submit",
+ triggeringChange.getId().get(), caller.getLoggableName(), cd.getId().get());
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ cd.getId(),
+ String.format("Insufficient permission to submit change %d", cd.getId().get())));
+ } else if (!cd.change().isNew()) {
if (!(cd.change().isMerged() && allowMerged)) {
- commitStatus.problem(
- cd.getId(), "Change " + cd.getId() + " is " + ChangeUtil.status(cd.change()));
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ cd.getId(),
+ String.format(
+ "Change %d is %s", cd.getId().get(), ChangeUtil.status(cd.change()))));
}
} else if (cd.change().isWorkInProgress()) {
- commitStatus.problem(cd.getId(), "Change " + cd.getId() + " is work in progress");
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ cd.getId(),
+ String.format("Change %d is marked work in progress", cd.getId().get())));
} else {
checkSubmitRequirements(cd);
- mergeMetrics.countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval(cd);
}
} catch (ResourceConflictException e) {
- commitStatus.problem(cd.getId(), e.getMessage());
- } catch (StorageException e) {
+ // Exception is thrown means submit requirement is not fulfilled.
+ problems.add(
+ ChangeProblem.create(
+ cd.getId(),
+ triggeringChange.getId().equals(cd.getId())
+ ? String.format("Change %s is not ready: %s", cd.getId(), e.getMessage())
+ : String.format(
+ "Change %s must be submitted with change %s but %s is not ready: %s",
+ triggeringChange.getId(), cd.getId(), cd.getId(), e.getMessage())));
+ } catch (StorageException | PermissionBackendException e) {
String msg = "Error checking submit rules for change";
- logger.atWarning().withCause(e).log("%s %s", msg, cd.getId());
- commitStatus.problem(cd.getId(), msg);
+ logger.atWarning().withCause(e).log("%s %s", msg, triggeringChange.getId());
+ problems.add(ChangeProblem.create(cd.getId(), msg));
}
}
+ return problems.build();
+ }
+
+ private void checkSubmitRulesAndState(Change triggeringChange, ChangeSet cs, boolean allowMerged)
+ throws ResourceConflictException {
+ checkCommonSubmitProblems(triggeringChange, cs, allowMerged, permissionBackend, caller).stream()
+ .forEach(cp -> commitStatus.problem(cp.getChangeId(), cp.getProblem()));
commitStatus.maybeFailVerbose();
+ mergeMetrics.countChangesThatWereSubmittedWithRebaserApproval(cs);
}
private void bypassSubmitRulesAndRequirements(ChangeSet cs) {
@@ -580,7 +680,7 @@
this.commitStatus = new CommitStatus(filteredNoteDbChangeSet, isRetry);
if (checkSubmitRules) {
logger.atFine().log("Checking submit rules and state");
- checkSubmitRulesAndState(filteredNoteDbChangeSet, isRetry);
+ checkSubmitRulesAndState(change, filteredNoteDbChangeSet, isRetry);
} else {
logger.atFine().log("Bypassing submit rules");
bypassSubmitRulesAndRequirements(filteredNoteDbChangeSet);
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/DefaultSubmitRequirementsIT.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/DefaultSubmitRequirementsIT.java
index fc8eaed..9af7a2d 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/DefaultSubmitRequirementsIT.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/DefaultSubmitRequirementsIT.java
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
.isEqualTo(
String.format(
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n"
- + "Change %s: submit requirement 'No-Unresolved-Comments' is unsatisfied.",
+ + "Change %1$s: Change %1$s is not ready: "
+ + "submit requirement 'No-Unresolved-Comments' is unsatisfied.",
r.getChange().getId().get()));
// Resolve the comment and check that the change can be submitted now.
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/AbstractSubmit.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/AbstractSubmit.java
index 25af040..0b86406 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/AbstractSubmit.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/AbstractSubmit.java
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@
+ num
+ ": Change "
+ num
- + " is work in progress");
+ + " is marked work in progress");
}
@Test
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
+ num
+ ": Change "
+ num
- + " is work in progress");
+ + " is marked work in progress");
}
}
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/SubmitByFastForwardIT.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/SubmitByFastForwardIT.java
index 1d8e0b8..7b3d1bc 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/SubmitByFastForwardIT.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/rest/change/SubmitByFastForwardIT.java
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@
"Failed to submit 2 changes due to the following problems:\n"
+ "Change "
+ id1
- + ": submit requirement 'Code-Review' is unsatisfied.");
+ + ": Change 8 must be submitted with change 7 but 7 is not ready: "
+ + "submit requirement 'Code-Review' is unsatisfied.");
RevCommit updatedHead = projectOperations.project(project).getHead("master");
assertThat(updatedHead.getId()).isEqualTo(initialHead.getId());
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/SubmittedTogetherIT.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/SubmittedTogetherIT.java
index 5a4f073..4ee5967 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/SubmittedTogetherIT.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/SubmittedTogetherIT.java
@@ -16,7 +16,10 @@
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.GitUtil.pushHead;
+import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.testsuite.project.TestProjectUpdate.block;
import static com.google.gerrit.extensions.api.changes.SubmittedTogetherOption.NON_VISIBLE_CHANGES;
+import static com.google.gerrit.server.group.SystemGroupBackend.REGISTERED_USERS;
+import static com.google.gerrit.testing.GerritJUnit.assertThrows;
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.AbstractDaemonTest;
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.GitUtil;
@@ -25,6 +28,8 @@
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.config.GerritConfig;
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.testsuite.project.ProjectOperations;
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.testsuite.request.RequestScopeOperations;
+import com.google.gerrit.entities.BranchNameKey;
+import com.google.gerrit.entities.Permission;
import com.google.gerrit.entities.Project;
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.api.changes.SubmittedTogetherInfo;
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.client.ChangeStatus;
@@ -32,6 +37,7 @@
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.client.SubmitType;
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.common.FileInfo;
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.common.RevisionInfo;
+import com.google.gerrit.extensions.restapi.ResourceConflictException;
import com.google.gerrit.testing.ConfigSuite;
import com.google.inject.Inject;
import java.util.EnumSet;
@@ -336,6 +342,41 @@
assertSubmittedTogether(id2, id2, id1);
}
+ @Test
+ public void permissionToSubmitForSomeChangesInTopic() throws Exception {
+ projectOperations
+ .project(project)
+ .forUpdate()
+ .add(block(Permission.SUBMIT).ref("refs/heads/testbranch").group(REGISTERED_USERS))
+ .update();
+
+ createBranch(BranchNameKey.create(getProject(), "testbranch"));
+ RevCommit initialHead = projectOperations.project(project).getHead("master");
+ // Create two independent commits and push.
+ RevCommit c1_1 = commitBuilder().add("a.txt", "1").message("subject: 1").create();
+ String id1 = getChangeId(c1_1);
+ pushHead(testRepo, "refs/for/master%topic=" + name("connectingTopic"), false);
+
+ testRepo.reset(initialHead);
+ RevCommit c2_1 = commitBuilder().add("b.txt", "2").message("subject: 2").create();
+ String id2 = getChangeId(c2_1);
+ pushHead(testRepo, "refs/for/testbranch%topic=" + name("connectingTopic"), false);
+
+ approve(id1);
+ approve(id2);
+ if (isSubmitWholeTopicEnabled()) {
+ ResourceConflictException e =
+ assertThrows(ResourceConflictException.class, () -> submit(id1));
+ assertThat(e.getMessage())
+ .contains(
+ String.format(
+ "Insufficient permission to submit change %d",
+ gApi.changes().id(id2).get()._number));
+ } else {
+ submit(id1);
+ }
+ }
+
private String getChangeId(RevCommit c) throws Exception {
return GitUtil.getChangeId(testRepo, c).get();
}
diff --git a/plugins/replication b/plugins/replication
index 499bbea..cc32fe2 160000
--- a/plugins/replication
+++ b/plugins/replication
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit 499bbea5a16ec443cafb8da95ccdc33f6e381d55
+Subproject commit cc32fe20832ea07c3a3388e87df777258686e5d5
diff --git a/polygerrit-ui/app/api/checks.ts b/polygerrit-ui/app/api/checks.ts
index 914b099..12fc1b075 100644
--- a/polygerrit-ui/app/api/checks.ts
+++ b/polygerrit-ui/app/api/checks.ts
@@ -177,6 +177,13 @@
checkLink?: string;
/**
+ * Indicates that the check run is powered by Aritificial Intelligence. This
+ * allows the UI to add special treatment, e.g. an icon to be added to the
+ * check name. Defaults to `false`.
+ */
+ isAiPowered?: boolean;
+
+ /**
* RUNNABLE: Not run (yet). Mostly useful for runs that the user can trigger
* (see actions) and for indicating that a check was not run at a
* later attempt. Cannot contain results.
