@PLUGIN@ configuration

Global configuration

The global plugin configuration is read from the $GERRIT_SITE/etc/owners.config and is applied across all projects in Gerrit.

owners.disable.branch : List of branches regex where the resolution of owners is disabled.

Example:

```
[owners "disable"]
  branch = refs/meta/config
  branch = refs/heads/sandboxes.*
```

owners.expandGroups : Expand owners and groups into account ids. If set to false all owners are left untouched, apart from e-mail addresses which have the domain dropped. Defaults to true.

Example:

```
[owners]
  expandGroups = false
```

owners.label : Global override for the label and score, separated by a comma, to use by the owners of changes for approving them. When defined, it overrides any other label definition set by the OWNERS at any level in any project.

Example:

```
[owners]
  label = Code-Review, 1
```

owners.enableSubmitRequirement : If set to true the approvals are evaluated through the owners plugin default submit requirement, named “Code-Review-from-Owners”, without a need of prolog predicate being added to a project or submit requirement configured in the project.config as it is automatically applied to all projects. Defaults to false.

Example:

```
[owners]
  enableSubmitRequirement = true
```

> **Notes:**
>
> The `owners.enableSubmitRequirement = true` is a global
> setting and allows for quick site switch from `prolog` submit rule to
> plugin's provided submit rule. It is a drop-in replacement therefore,
> similarly to `prolog` rule, it cannot be overridden by Gerrit. In case
> when one-step migration is not feasible (e.g. when `prolog` rules need to
> be slowly phased out or when more control is needed over rule's
> applicability, submitability or ability to overide) one can configure
> submit requirement in `project.config` for a certain project (or
> hierarchy of projects), without turning it on globally, as
> `approval_owners` predicate is _always_ available.
>
> Please also note, that project's `rules.pl` should be removed in this
> case so that it doesn't interfere with a change evaluation.
>
> The minimal configuration looks like below (see
> [submit requirements documentation](/Documentation/config-submit-requirements.html) for more details):
> ```
> [submit-requirement "Owner-Approval"]
>   description = Files needs to be approved by owners
>   submittableIf = has:approval_owners
> ```

cache.“owners.path_owners_entries”.memoryLimit : The cache is used to hold the parsed version of OWNERS files in the repository so that when submit rules are calculated (either through prolog or through submit requirements) it is not read over and over again. The cache entry gets invalidated when OWNERS file branch is updated. By default it follows default Gerrit's cache memory limit but it makes sense to adjust it as a function of number of project that use the owners plugin multiplied by average number of active branches (plus 1 for the refs/meta/config) and average number of directories (as directory hierarchy back to root is checked for the OWNERS file existence). Note that in opposite to the previous settings the modification needs to be performed in the $GERRIT_SITE/etc/gerrit.config file.

Example

```
[cache "owners.path_owners_entries"]
  memoryLimit = 2048
```

Configuration

Owner approval is determined based on OWNERS files located in the same repository on the target branch of the changes uploaded for review.

The OWNERS file has the following YAML structure:

inherited: true
label: Code-Review, 1
owners:
- some.email@example.com
- User Name
- group/Group of Users
matchers:
- suffix: .java
  owners:
      [...]
- regex: .*/README.*
  owners:
      [...]
- partial_regex: example
  owners:
      [...]
- exact: path/to/file.txt
      [...]

NOTE: Be aware to double check that emails and full user names correspond to valid registered Gerrit users. When owner user full name or e-mail cannot be resolved, a corresponding WARN message is logged on Gerrit error_log and the user entry dropped.

That translates to inheriting owner email address from any parent OWNER files and to define ‘some.email@example.com’ or ‘User Name’ users as the mandatory reviewers for all changes that include modification to those files.

To specify a group of people instead of naming individual owners, prefix the group name or UUID with ‘group/’.

Additional owners can be specified for files selected by other matching conditions (matchers section). Matching can be done by file suffix, regex (partial or full) and exact string comparison. For exact match, path is relative to the root of the repo.

NOTE: The generic matcher is a special type of regex matching that is applied only when none of the other sections are matching. It is used to define fallback rules. The generic: .* is the top-level fallback and can be used with other more specific generic matchers.

The plugin analyzes the latest patch set by looking at each file directory and building an OWNERS hierarchy. It stops once it finds an OWNERS file that has “inherited” set to false (by default it’s true.)

NOTE: The label value (default is Code-Review) is taken into consideration only when owners.enableSubmitRequirement = true. Owners scores are matched against the label specified in the property in question. The required label‘s score can be provided (by default label’s scores configuration is used) so that owners don‘t have to be granted with the maximum label’s score. Note that only single digit (0..9) is allowed.

For example, imagine the following tree with a default Gerrit project labels configuration:

/OWNERS
/example/src/main/OWNERS
/example/src/main/java/com/example/foo/Foo.java
/example/src/main/resources/config.properties
/example/src/test/OWNERS
/example/src/test/java/com/example/foo/FooTest.java

If you submit a patch set that changes /example/src/main/java/com/example/foo/Foo.java then the plugin will first open /example/src/main/OWNERS and if inherited is set to true combine it with the owners listed in /OWNERS.

If for each patch there is a reviewer who gave a Code-Review +2 then the plugin will not add any labels, otherwise, it will add label('Code-Review from owners', need(_)).

Global project OWNERS

Set a OWNERS file into the project refs/meta/config to define a global set of rules applied to every change pushed, regardless of the folder or target branch.

Example of assigning every configuration files to a specific owner group:

matchers:
- suffix: .config
  owners:
  - Configuration Managers

Global refs/meta/config OWNERS configuration is inherited only when the OWNERS file contain the ‘inherited: true’ condition at the top of the file or if they are absent.

That means that in the absence of any OWNERS file in the target branch, the refs/meta/config OWNERS is used as global default.

If the global project OWNERS has the ‘inherited: true’, it will check for a global project OWNERS in all parent projects up to All-Projects.

Example 1 - OWNERS file without matchers

Given an OWNERS configuration of:

inherited: true
owners:
- John Doe
- Doug Smith

In this case the owners plugin will assume the default label configuration,Code-Review +2, as indication of approval.

To enforce submittability only when the specified owners have approved the change, you can then either enable owners.enableSubmitRequirement = true in your gerrit.config or define a submit requirement in your project.config that uses the has:approval_owners in the submittableIf section, like so:

[submit-requirement "Owner-Approval"]
       description = Files needs to be approved by owners
       submittableIf = has:approval_owners

See notes for an example on how to enable submit requirements for a specific project only.

Example 2 - OWNERS file with custom approval label

Sometimes, teams might wish to use a different label to signal approval from an owner, rather than the default Code-Review +2. For example, you might wish to have a governance team explicitly approving changes but do not wish to necessarily grant them code review permissions.

In this case, we need to grant specific groups with a custom label without necessarily giving them Code-Review +2 rights on the entire project.

Amend the project.config as shown in below and add a new label; then give permissions to any registered user:

[label "Owner-Approved"]
     function = NoOp
     defaultValue = 0
     copyMinScore = true
     copyAllScoresOnTrivialRebase = true
     value = -1 I don't want this to be merged
     value =  0 No score
     value = +1 Approved
[access "refs/heads/*"]
     label-Owner-Approved = -1..+1 group Registered Users

Given now an OWNERS configuration of:

inherited: true
label: Owner-Approved, 1
owners:
- John Doe
- Doug Smith

This will mean that, a change cannot be submitted until ‘John Doe’ or ‘Doug Smith’ vote +1 on the Owner-Approved label, independently from whomever else has provided a Code-Review +2.

NOTE: You can also use label: Code-Review, 1 as your definition of submittability

Finally to enable this, you'll need to define a custom submit requirement in your project.config(as above) or enable owners.enableSubmitRequirement = true in your owners.config

If you no longer wish to require a Code-Review +2 and would rather only use the custom submit requirement, you have two options:

  • change the definition of the Code-Review label in All-Projects's project.config so that function = NoOp.
  • set an overrideIf clause in your custom submit requirement definition

See notes for an example on how to enable submit requirements for a specific project only.

See notes for an example on how to modify label functions, as by default Code-Review requires at least one max vote from any user.

Example 3 - Owners based on matchers

Often the ownership comes from the developer‘s skills and competencies and cannot be purely defined by the project’s directory structure. For instance, all the files ending with .sql should be owned and signed-off by the DBA while all the ones that contain ‘Test’ should be reviewed by the QA team.

Given an OWNERS configuration of:

inherited: true
matchers:
- suffix: .sql
  owners:
  - Mister Dba
- regex: .*Test.*
  owners:
  - John Bug
  - Matt Free

You can then either enable owners.enableSubmitRequirement = true in your gerrit.config or define a submit requirement in your project.config that uses the has:approval_owners in the applicableIf section.

See notes for an example on how to enable submit requirements for a specific project only.