)]}'
{
  "commit": "3e98971eea4677dda447034d51d3d92e26acf4b7",
  "tree": "7db14a6fea772258be0a946166209e75c603d017",
  "parents": [
    "c5c5302a0d7dd02acaf4e8f37acc84f94b0f25c3"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Edwin Kempin",
    "email": "ekempin@google.com",
    "time": "Tue Dec 01 10:56:33 2020 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Edwin Kempin",
    "email": "ekempin@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Dec 02 11:49:45 2020 +0100"
  },
  "message": "Test that OO+2 counts as code owner override when OO+1 is required\n\nIf Owners-Override+1 is required as code owner override, also a\nOwners-Overirde+2 should count as override. Cover this by a test.\n\nSigned-off-by: Edwin Kempin \u003cekempin@google.com\u003e\nChange-Id: I2109d0e3f441f079cb2ccb51eb65a8eff6c21d76\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "12bd0f2305923bd5ab5d73707df73064c9547a54",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "javatests/com/google/gerrit/plugins/codeowners/backend/CodeOwnerApprovalCheckTest.java",
      "new_id": "be4d6b02725e2a178aff9fcfff007232db2ea756",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "javatests/com/google/gerrit/plugins/codeowners/backend/CodeOwnerApprovalCheckTest.java"
    }
  ]
}