)]}'
{
  "commit": "88b25a58f0164ab609061cb20cfb83c3bcb9a9ec",
  "tree": "9f186ddb6c1603bb33b8a8bcbbc73d39fc901857",
  "parents": [
    "848186da86d624d09cd1518378edff4ad9b7f14f"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Christian Halstrick",
    "email": "christian.halstrick@sap.com",
    "time": "Fri Oct 10 00:00:45 2014 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Matthias Sohn",
    "email": "matthias.sohn@sap.com",
    "time": "Fri Oct 10 10:52:43 2014 -0400"
  },
  "message": "When marking commits as uninteresting don\u0027t care if the tree exists\n\nWhen during an ObjectWalk commits are marked as uninteresting we should\nbe tolerant against the situation that the commit exists in the repo but\nthe referenced tree is not exisiting. Since commit\nc4797fe98655b3d52d0a90ba44fce6e053db3b8b we are throwing\nMissingObjectException in such a case. This semantic differs from native\ngit behaviour and may cause push operations to fail while they would\nwork in native git. See:\nhttp://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/egit-dev/msg03585.html\n\nBug: 445744\nChange-Id: Ib7dec10fd2ef1adbb8adbabb9d3d5a64e554286a\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "ef96b77c5f6dec1ca55a6885053e4f0c8cf916ce",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/revwalk/ObjectWalk.java",
      "new_id": "b73ccb197482e3352615881932df77ba9d0d6348",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/revwalk/ObjectWalk.java"
    }
  ]
}