diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalCopier.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalCopier.java
index 059445e..cd2d79e 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalCopier.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalCopier.java
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 import com.google.gerrit.entities.Project;
 import com.google.gerrit.exceptions.StorageException;
 import com.google.gerrit.extensions.client.ChangeKind;
+import com.google.gerrit.index.query.Predicate;
 import com.google.gerrit.index.query.QueryParseException;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.PatchSetUtil;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.change.ChangeKindCache;
@@ -85,7 +86,7 @@
      *   <li>the approval is not overridden by a current approval on the patch set
      * </ul>
      */
-    public abstract ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovals();
+    public abstract ImmutableSet<PatchSetApprovalData> copiedApprovals();
 
     /**
      * Approvals on the previous patch set that have not been copied to the patch set.
@@ -96,7 +97,7 @@
      * <p>Only returns non-copied approvals of the previous patch set. Approvals from earlier patch
      * sets that were outdated before are not included.
      */
-    public abstract ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> outdatedApprovals();
+    public abstract ImmutableSet<PatchSetApprovalData> outdatedApprovals();
 
     static Result empty() {
       return create(
@@ -105,10 +106,68 @@
 
     @VisibleForTesting
     public static Result create(
-        ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovals,
-        ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> outdatedApprovals) {
+        ImmutableSet<PatchSetApprovalData> copiedApprovals,
+        ImmutableSet<PatchSetApprovalData> outdatedApprovals) {
       return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_Result(copiedApprovals, outdatedApprovals);
     }
+
+    /**
+     * A {@link PatchSetApproval} with information about which atoms of the copy condition are
+     * passing/failing.
+     */
+    @AutoValue
+    public abstract static class PatchSetApprovalData {
+      /** The approval. */
+      public abstract PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval();
+
+      /**
+       * Lists the leaf predicates of the copy condition that are fulfilled.
+       *
+       * <p>Example: The expression
+       *
+       * <pre>
+       * changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN
+       * </pre>
+       *
+       * has two leaf predicates:
+       *
+       * <ul>
+       *   <li>changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE
+       *   <li>is:MIN
+       * </ul>
+       *
+       * This method will return the leaf predicates that are fulfilled, for example if only the
+       * first predicate is fulfilled, the returned list will be equal to
+       * ["changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE"].
+       *
+       * <p>Empty if the label type is missing, if there is no copy condition or if the copy
+       * condition is not parseable.
+       */
+      public abstract ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms();
+
+      /**
+       * Lists the leaf predicates of the copy condition that are not fulfilled. See {@link
+       * #passingAtoms()} for more details.
+       *
+       * <p>Empty if the label type is missing, if there is no copy condition or if the copy
+       * condition is not parseable.
+       */
+      public abstract ImmutableSet<String> failingAtoms();
+
+      @VisibleForTesting
+      public static PatchSetApprovalData create(
+          PatchSetApproval approval,
+          ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms,
+          ImmutableSet<String> failingAtoms) {
+        return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_Result_PatchSetApprovalData(
+            approval, passingAtoms, failingAtoms);
+      }
+
+      private static PatchSetApprovalData createForMissingLabelType(PatchSetApproval approval) {
+        return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_Result_PatchSetApprovalData(
+            approval, ImmutableSet.of(), ImmutableSet.of());
+      }
+    }
   }
 
   private final GitRepositoryManager repoManager;
@@ -227,17 +286,18 @@
                 followUpPatchSet.commitId());
         boolean isMerge = isMerge(changeNotes.getProjectName(), revWalk, followUpPatchSet);
 
-        if (canCopy(
-            changeNotes,
-            priorPatchSet.id(),
-            followUpPatchSet,
-            approverId,
-            labelType.get(),
-            approvalValue,
-            changeKind,
-            isMerge,
-            revWalk,
-            repo.getConfig())) {
+        if (computeCopyResult(
+                changeNotes,
+                priorPatchSet.id(),
+                followUpPatchSet,
+                approverId,
+                labelType.get(),
+                approvalValue,
+                changeKind,
+                isMerge,
+                revWalk,
+                repo.getConfig())
+            .canCopy()) {
           targetPatchSetsBuilder.add(followUpPatchSetId);
         } else {
           // The approval is not copyable to this follow-up patch set.
@@ -251,7 +311,14 @@
     return targetPatchSetsBuilder.build();
   }
 
-  private boolean canCopy(
+  /**
+   * Checks whether a given approval can be copied from the given source patch set to the given
+   * target patch set.
+   *
+   * <p>The returned result also informs about which atoms of the copy condition are
+   * passing/failing.
+   */
+  private ApprovalCopyResult computeCopyResult(
       ChangeNotes changeNotes,
       PatchSet.Id sourcePatchSetId,
       PatchSet targetPatchSet,
@@ -263,7 +330,7 @@
       RevWalk revWalk,
       Config repoConfig) {
     if (!labelType.getCopyCondition().isPresent()) {
-      return false;
+      return ApprovalCopyResult.createForMissingCopyCondition();
     }
     ApprovalContext ctx =
         ApprovalContext.create(
@@ -283,15 +350,18 @@
       // request (e.g. a group used in this query might not be visible to the person sending this
       // request).
       try (ManualRequestContext ignored = requestContext.open()) {
-        return approvalQueryBuilder
-            .parse(labelType.getCopyCondition().get())
-            .asMatchable()
-            .match(ctx);
+        Predicate<ApprovalContext> copyConditionPredicate =
+            approvalQueryBuilder.parse(labelType.getCopyCondition().get());
+        boolean canCopy = copyConditionPredicate.asMatchable().match(ctx);
+        ImmutableSet.Builder<String> passingAtoms = ImmutableSet.builder();
+        ImmutableSet.Builder<String> failingAtoms = ImmutableSet.builder();
+        evaluateAtoms(copyConditionPredicate, ctx, passingAtoms, failingAtoms);
+        return ApprovalCopyResult.create(canCopy, passingAtoms.build(), failingAtoms.build());
       }
     } catch (QueryParseException e) {
       logger.atWarning().withCause(e).log(
           "Unable to copy label because config is invalid. This should have been caught before.");
-      return false;
+      return ApprovalCopyResult.createForNonParseableCopyCondition();
     }
   }
 
@@ -321,8 +391,10 @@
     nonCopiedApprovalsForGivenPatchSet.forEach(
         psa -> currentApprovalsByUser.put(psa.label(), psa.accountId(), psa));
 
-    Table<String, Account.Id, PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovalsByUser = HashBasedTable.create();
-    ImmutableSet.Builder<PatchSetApproval> outdatedApprovalsBuilder = ImmutableSet.builder();
+    Table<String, Account.Id, Result.PatchSetApprovalData> copiedApprovalsByUser =
+        HashBasedTable.create();
+    ImmutableSet.Builder<Result.PatchSetApprovalData> outdatedApprovalsBuilder =
+        ImmutableSet.builder();
 
     ImmutableList<PatchSetApproval> priorApprovals =
         notes.load().getApprovals().all().get(priorPatchSet.getKey());
@@ -362,35 +434,55 @@
             priorPsa.key().patchSetId().changeId().get(),
             targetPsId.get(),
             projectName);
-        outdatedApprovalsBuilder.add(priorPsa);
+        outdatedApprovalsBuilder.add(
+            Result.PatchSetApprovalData.createForMissingLabelType(priorPsa));
         continue;
       }
-      if (canCopy(
-          notes,
-          priorPsa.patchSetId(),
-          targetPatchSet,
-          priorPsa.accountId(),
-          labelType.get(),
-          priorPsa.value(),
-          changeKind,
-          isMerge,
-          rw,
-          repoConfig)) {
+      ApprovalCopyResult approvalCopyResult =
+          computeCopyResult(
+              notes,
+              priorPsa.patchSetId(),
+              targetPatchSet,
+              priorPsa.accountId(),
+              labelType.get(),
+              priorPsa.value(),
+              changeKind,
+              isMerge,
+              rw,
+              repoConfig);
+      if (approvalCopyResult.canCopy()) {
         if (!currentApprovalsByUser.contains(priorPsa.label(), priorPsa.accountId())) {
+          PatchSetApproval copiedApproval = priorPsa.copyWithPatchSet(targetPatchSet.id());
+
+          // Normalize the copied approval.
+          Optional<PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovalNormalized =
+              labelNormalizer.normalize(notes, copiedApproval);
+          logger.atFine().log(
+              "Copied approval %s has been normalized to %s",
+              copiedApproval,
+              copiedApprovalNormalized.map(PatchSetApproval::toString).orElse("n/a"));
+          if (!copiedApprovalNormalized.isPresent()) {
+            continue;
+          }
+
           copiedApprovalsByUser.put(
               priorPsa.label(),
               priorPsa.accountId(),
-              priorPsa.copyWithPatchSet(targetPatchSet.id()));
+              Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                  copiedApprovalNormalized.get(),
+                  approvalCopyResult.passingAtoms(),
+                  approvalCopyResult.failingAtoms()));
         }
       } else {
-        outdatedApprovalsBuilder.add(priorPsa);
+        outdatedApprovalsBuilder.add(
+            Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                priorPsa, approvalCopyResult.passingAtoms(), approvalCopyResult.failingAtoms()));
         continue;
       }
     }
 
-    ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovals =
-        labelNormalizer.normalize(notes, copiedApprovalsByUser.values()).getNormalized();
-    return Result.create(copiedApprovals, outdatedApprovalsBuilder.build());
+    return Result.create(
+        ImmutableSet.copyOf(copiedApprovalsByUser.values()), outdatedApprovalsBuilder.build());
   }
 
   private boolean isMerge(Project.NameKey project, RevWalk rw, PatchSet patchSet) {
@@ -404,4 +496,72 @@
           e);
     }
   }
+
+  /**
+   * Evaluates a predicate of the copy condition and adds its passing and failing atoms to the given
+   * builders.
+   *
+   * @param predicate a predicate of the copy condition that should be evaluated
+   * @param approvalContext the approval context against which the predicate should be evaluated
+   * @param passingAtoms a builder to which passing atoms should be added
+   * @param failingAtoms a builder to which failing atoms should be added
+   */
+  private static void evaluateAtoms(
+      Predicate<ApprovalContext> predicate,
+      ApprovalContext approvalContext,
+      ImmutableSet.Builder<String> passingAtoms,
+      ImmutableSet.Builder<String> failingAtoms) {
+    if (predicate.isLeaf()) {
+      boolean isPassing = predicate.asMatchable().match(approvalContext);
+      (isPassing ? passingAtoms : failingAtoms).add(predicate.getPredicateString());
+      return;
+    }
+    predicate
+        .getChildren()
+        .forEach(
+            childPredicate ->
+                evaluateAtoms(childPredicate, approvalContext, passingAtoms, failingAtoms));
+  }
+
+  /** Result for checking if an approval can be copied to the next patch set. */
+  @AutoValue
+  abstract static class ApprovalCopyResult {
+    /** Whether the approval can be copied to the next patch set. */
+    abstract boolean canCopy();
+
+    /**
+     * Lists the leaf predicates of the copy condition that are fulfilled. See {@link
+     * Result.PatchSetApprovalData#passingAtoms()} for more details.
+     *
+     * <p>Empty if there is no copy condition or if the copy condition is not parseable.
+     */
+    abstract ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms();
+
+    /**
+     * Lists the leaf predicates of the copy condition that are not fulfilled. See {@link
+     * Result.PatchSetApprovalData#passingAtoms()} for more details.
+     *
+     * <p>Empty if there is no copy condition or if the copy condition is not parseable.
+     */
+    abstract ImmutableSet<String> failingAtoms();
+
+    private static ApprovalCopyResult create(
+        boolean canCopy, ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms, ImmutableSet<String> failingAtoms) {
+      return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_ApprovalCopyResult(canCopy, passingAtoms, failingAtoms);
+    }
+
+    private static ApprovalCopyResult createForMissingCopyCondition() {
+      return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_ApprovalCopyResult(
+          /* canCopy= */ false,
+          /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+          /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of());
+    }
+
+    private static ApprovalCopyResult createForNonParseableCopyCondition() {
+      return new AutoValue_ApprovalCopier_ApprovalCopyResult(
+          /* canCopy= */ false,
+          /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+          /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of());
+    }
+  }
 }
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalsUtil.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalsUtil.java
index bd31356f..09820b1 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalsUtil.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/approval/ApprovalsUtil.java
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@
 package com.google.gerrit.server.approval;
 
 import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
 import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;
 import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableListMultimap.toImmutableListMultimap;
+import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet.toImmutableSet;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ReviewerStateInternal.CC;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ReviewerStateInternal.REVIEWER;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.project.ProjectCache.illegalState;
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@
 import static java.util.stream.Collectors.joining;
 
 import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
+import com.google.common.base.Function;
 import com.google.common.collect.ArrayListMultimap;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableListMultimap;
@@ -85,6 +88,7 @@
 import java.util.Objects;
 import java.util.Optional;
 import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.StringTokenizer;
 import org.eclipse.jgit.lib.Config;
 import org.eclipse.jgit.revwalk.RevWalk;
 
@@ -399,12 +403,17 @@
       ChangeUpdate changeUpdate) {
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         approvalCopier.forPatchSet(notes, patchSet, revWalk, repoConfig);
-    approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals().forEach(a -> changeUpdate.putCopiedApproval(a));
+    approvalCopierResult
+        .copiedApprovals()
+        .forEach(approvalData -> changeUpdate.putCopiedApproval(approvalData.patchSetApproval()));
 
     if (!notes.getChange().isWorkInProgress()) {
       // The attention set should not be updated when the change is work-in-progress.
       addAttentionSetUpdatesForOutdatedApprovals(
-          changeUpdate, approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals());
+          changeUpdate,
+          approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals().stream()
+              .map(ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::patchSetApproval)
+              .collect(toImmutableSet()));
     }
 
     return approvalCopierResult;
@@ -511,31 +520,40 @@
    *       "is:FOO")}
    * </ul>
    *
-   * @param approvals the approvals that should be formatted
+   * @param approvalDatas the approvals that should be formatted, with approval meta data
    * @param labelTypes the label types
    * @return bullet list with the formatted approvals
    */
   private String formatApprovalListWithCopyCondition(
-      ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> approvals, LabelTypes labelTypes) {
+      ImmutableSet<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalDatas,
+      LabelTypes labelTypes) {
     StringBuilder message = new StringBuilder();
 
     // sort approvals by label vote so that we list them in a deterministic order
-    ImmutableList<PatchSetApproval> approvalsSortedByLabelVote =
-        approvals.stream()
-            .sorted(comparing(psa -> LabelVote.create(psa.label(), psa.value()).format()))
+    ImmutableList<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalsSortedByLabelVote =
+        approvalDatas.stream()
+            .sorted(
+                comparing(
+                    approvalData ->
+                        LabelVote.create(
+                                approvalData.patchSetApproval().label(),
+                                approvalData.patchSetApproval().value())
+                            .format()))
             .collect(toImmutableList());
 
-    ImmutableListMultimap<String, PatchSetApproval> approvalsByLabel =
-        Multimaps.index(approvalsSortedByLabelVote, PatchSetApproval::label);
+    ImmutableListMultimap<String, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalsByLabel =
+        Multimaps.index(
+            approvalsSortedByLabelVote, approvalData -> approvalData.patchSetApproval().label());
 
-    for (Map.Entry<String, Collection<PatchSetApproval>> approvalsByLabelEntry :
-        approvalsByLabel.asMap().entrySet()) {
+    for (Map.Entry<String, Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>>
+        approvalsByLabelEntry : approvalsByLabel.asMap().entrySet()) {
       String label = approvalsByLabelEntry.getKey();
-      Collection<PatchSetApproval> approvalsForSameLabel = approvalsByLabelEntry.getValue();
+      Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalsForSameLabel =
+          approvalsByLabelEntry.getValue();
 
-      message.append("* ");
       if (!labelTypes.byLabel(label).isPresent()) {
         message
+            .append("* ")
             .append(formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsForSameLabel))
             .append(" (label type is missing)\n");
         continue;
@@ -543,22 +561,65 @@
 
       LabelType labelType = labelTypes.byLabel(label).get();
       if (!labelType.getCopyCondition().isPresent()) {
-        message.append(formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsForSameLabel)).append("\n");
+        message
+            .append("* ")
+            .append(formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsForSameLabel))
+            .append("\n");
         continue;
       }
 
-      message
-          .append(
-              formatApprovalsWithCopyCondition(
-                  approvalsForSameLabel, labelType.getCopyCondition().get()))
-          .append("\n");
+      // Group the approvals that have the same label by the passing atoms. If approvals have the
+      // same label, but have different passing atoms, we need to list them in separate lines
+      // (because in each line we will highlight different passing atoms that matched). Approvals
+      // with the same label and the same passing atoms are formatted as a single line.
+      ImmutableListMultimap<ImmutableSet<String>, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+          approvalsForSameLabelByPassingAndFailingAtoms =
+              Multimaps.index(
+                  approvalsForSameLabel, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::passingAtoms);
+
+      // Approvals with the same label that have the same passing atoms should have the same failing
+      // atoms (since the label is the same they have the same copy condition).
+      approvalsForSameLabelByPassingAndFailingAtoms
+          .asMap()
+          .values()
+          .forEach(
+              approvalsForSameLabelAndSamePassingAtoms ->
+                  checkThatPropertyIsTheSameForAllApprovals(
+                      approvalsForSameLabelAndSamePassingAtoms,
+                      "failing atoms",
+                      approvalData -> approvalData.failingAtoms()));
+
+      // The order in which we add lines for approvals with the same label but different passing
+      // atoms needs to be deterministic for tests. Just sort them by the string representation of
+      // the passing atoms.
+      for (Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+          approvalsForSameLabelWithSamePassingAndFailingAtoms :
+              approvalsForSameLabelByPassingAndFailingAtoms.asMap().entrySet().stream()
+                  .sorted(
+                      comparing(
+                          (Map.Entry<
+                                      ImmutableSet<String>,
+                                      Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>>
+                                  e) -> e.getKey().toString()))
+                  .map(Map.Entry::getValue)
+                  .collect(toImmutableList())) {
+        message
+            .append("* ")
+            .append(
+                formatApprovalsWithCopyCondition(
+                    approvalsForSameLabelWithSamePassingAndFailingAtoms,
+                    labelType.getCopyCondition().get()))
+            .append("\n");
+      }
     }
 
     return message.toString();
   }
 
   /**
-   * Formats the given approvals of the same label with the given copy condition.
+   * Formats the given approvals with the given copy condition.
+   *
+   * <p>The given approvals must have the same label and the same passing and failing atoms.
    *
    * <p>E.g.: {Code-Review+1, Code-Review+2 (copy condition: "is:MIN")}
    *
@@ -578,12 +639,29 @@
    *       "is:FOO")}
    * </ul>
    *
-   * @param approvalsForSameLabel the approvals that should be formatted, must be for the same label
+   * @param approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms the approvals that should be
+   *     formatted, must be for the same label
    * @param copyCondition the copy condition of the label
    * @return the formatted approvals
    */
   private String formatApprovalsWithCopyCondition(
-      Collection<PatchSetApproval> approvalsForSameLabel, String copyCondition) {
+      Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+          approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms,
+      String copyCondition) {
+    // Check that all given approvals have the same label and the same passing and failing atoms.
+    checkThatPropertyIsTheSameForAllApprovals(
+        approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms,
+        "label",
+        approvalData -> approvalData.patchSetApproval().label());
+    checkThatPropertyIsTheSameForAllApprovals(
+        approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms,
+        "passing atoms",
+        approvalData -> approvalData.passingAtoms());
+    checkThatPropertyIsTheSameForAllApprovals(
+        approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms,
+        "failing atoms",
+        approvalData -> approvalData.failingAtoms());
+
     StringBuilder message = new StringBuilder();
 
     boolean containsUserInPredicate;
@@ -591,7 +669,8 @@
       containsUserInPredicate = containsUserInPredicate(copyCondition);
     } catch (QueryParseException e) {
       logger.atWarning().withCause(e).log("Non-parsable query condition");
-      message.append(formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsForSameLabel));
+      message.append(
+          formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms));
       message.append(String.format(" (non-parseable copy condition: \"%s\")", copyCondition));
       return message.toString();
     }
@@ -618,26 +697,35 @@
 
       // sort the approvals by their approvers name-email so that the approvers always appear in a
       // deterministic order
-      ImmutableList<PatchSetApproval> approvalsSortedByLabelVoteAndApprover =
-          approvalsForSameLabel.stream()
-              .sorted(
-                  comparing(
-                          (PatchSetApproval psa) ->
-                              LabelVote.create(psa.label(), psa.value()).format())
-                      .thenComparing(
-                          psa ->
-                              accountCache
-                                  .getEvenIfMissing(psa.accountId())
-                                  .account()
-                                  .getNameEmail(anonymousCowardName)))
-              .collect(toImmutableList());
+      ImmutableList<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+          approvalsSortedByLabelVoteAndApprover =
+              approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms.stream()
+                  .sorted(
+                      comparing(
+                              (ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData approvalData) ->
+                                  LabelVote.create(
+                                          approvalData.patchSetApproval().label(),
+                                          approvalData.patchSetApproval().value())
+                                      .format())
+                          .thenComparing(
+                              approvalData ->
+                                  accountCache
+                                      .getEvenIfMissing(approvalData.patchSetApproval().accountId())
+                                      .account()
+                                      .getNameEmail(anonymousCowardName)))
+                  .collect(toImmutableList());
 
       ImmutableListMultimap<LabelVote, Account.Id> approversByLabelVote =
           Multimaps.index(
                   approvalsSortedByLabelVoteAndApprover,
-                  psa -> LabelVote.create(psa.label(), psa.value()))
+                  approvalData ->
+                      LabelVote.create(
+                          approvalData.patchSetApproval().label(),
+                          approvalData.patchSetApproval().value()))
               .entries().stream()
-              .collect(toImmutableListMultimap(e -> e.getKey(), e -> e.getValue().accountId()));
+              .collect(
+                  toImmutableListMultimap(
+                      e -> e.getKey(), e -> e.getValue().patchSetApproval().accountId()));
       message.append(
           approversByLabelVote.asMap().entrySet().stream()
               .map(
@@ -647,12 +735,64 @@
               .collect(joining(", ")));
     } else {
       // copy condition doesn't contain a UserInPredicate
-      message.append(formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsForSameLabel));
+      message.append(
+          formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms));
     }
-    message.append(String.format(" (copy condition: \"%s\")", copyCondition));
+    ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms =
+        !approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms.isEmpty()
+            ? approvalsWithSameLabelAndSamePassingAndFailingAtoms.iterator().next().passingAtoms()
+            : ImmutableSet.of();
+    message.append(
+        String.format(
+            " (copy condition: \"%s\")",
+            formatCopyConditionAsMarkdown(copyCondition, passingAtoms)));
     return message.toString();
   }
 
+  /** Checks that all given approvals have the same value for a given property. */
+  private void checkThatPropertyIsTheSameForAllApprovals(
+      Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvals,
+      String propertyName,
+      Function<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData, ?> propertyExtractor) {
+    if (approvals.isEmpty()) {
+      return;
+    }
+
+    Object propertyOfFirstEntry = propertyExtractor.apply(approvals.iterator().next());
+    approvals.forEach(
+        approvalData ->
+            checkState(
+                propertyExtractor.apply(approvalData).equals(propertyOfFirstEntry),
+                "property %s of approval %s does not match, expected value: %s",
+                propertyName,
+                approvalData,
+                propertyOfFirstEntry));
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Formats the given copy condition as a Markdown string.
+   *
+   * <p>Passing atoms are formatted as bold.
+   *
+   * @param copyCondition the copy condition that should be formatted
+   * @param passingAtoms atoms of the copy conditions which are passing/matching
+   * @return the formatted copy condition as a Markdown string
+   */
+  private String formatCopyConditionAsMarkdown(
+      String copyCondition, ImmutableSet<String> passingAtoms) {
+    StringBuilder formattedCopyCondition = new StringBuilder();
+    StringTokenizer tokenizer = new StringTokenizer(copyCondition, " ()", /* returnDelims= */ true);
+    while (tokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) {
+      String token = tokenizer.nextToken();
+      if (passingAtoms.contains(token)) {
+        formattedCopyCondition.append("**" + token.replace("*", "\\*") + "**");
+      } else {
+        formattedCopyCondition.append(token);
+      }
+    }
+    return formattedCopyCondition.toString();
+  }
+
   private boolean containsUserInPredicate(String copyCondition) throws QueryParseException {
     // Use a request context to run checks as an internal user with expanded visibility. This is
     // so that the output of the copy condition does not depend on who is running the current
@@ -675,8 +815,9 @@
    * @return the given approvals as a comma-separated list of label votes
    */
   private String formatApprovalsAsLabelVotesList(
-      Collection<PatchSetApproval> sortedApprovalsForSameLabel) {
+      Collection<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> sortedApprovalsForSameLabel) {
     return sortedApprovalsForSameLabel.stream()
+        .map(ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::patchSetApproval)
         .map(psa -> LabelVote.create(psa.label(), psa.value()))
         .distinct()
         .map(LabelVote::format)
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/LabelNormalizer.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/LabelNormalizer.java
index fb6b177..b1fcf48 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/LabelNormalizer.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/LabelNormalizer.java
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
 import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
+import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
 import com.google.common.collect.Streams;
 import com.google.gerrit.entities.Change;
 import com.google.gerrit.entities.LabelType;
@@ -131,6 +132,20 @@
     return Result.create(unchanged, updated, deleted);
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Returns a copy of the given approval normalized to the defined ranges for the label type. If
+   * the approval is for an unknown label {@link Optional#empty()} is returned
+   *
+   * @param notes change notes containing the given approval
+   * @param approval approval that should be normalized
+   */
+  public Optional<PatchSetApproval> normalize(ChangeNotes notes, PatchSetApproval approval) {
+    Result result = normalize(notes, ImmutableSet.of(approval));
+    return Optional.ofNullable(
+        Iterables.getFirst(
+            result.unchanged(), Iterables.getFirst(result.updated(), /* defaultValue= */ null)));
+  }
+
   private PatchSetApproval applyTypeFloor(LabelType lt, PatchSetApproval a) {
     PatchSetApproval.Builder b = a.toBuilder();
     LabelValue atMin = lt.getMin();
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/PatchSetInserter.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/PatchSetInserter.java
index f7bec1c0..1fe67af 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/PatchSetInserter.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/change/PatchSetInserter.java
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 package com.google.gerrit.server.change;
 
 import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
+import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet.toImmutableSet;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ReviewerStateInternal.CC;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ReviewerStateInternal.REVIEWER;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.project.ProjectCache.illegalState;
@@ -368,7 +369,9 @@
               ctx,
               patchSet,
               mailMessage,
-              approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(),
+              approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals().stream()
+                  .map(ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::patchSetApproval)
+                  .collect(toImmutableSet()),
               oldReviewers.byState(REVIEWER),
               oldReviewers.byState(CC),
               changeKind,
diff --git a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/git/receive/ReplaceOp.java b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/git/receive/ReplaceOp.java
index 6e5cfff..0e17342 100644
--- a/java/com/google/gerrit/server/git/receive/ReplaceOp.java
+++ b/java/com/google/gerrit/server/git/receive/ReplaceOp.java
@@ -510,7 +510,9 @@
             ctx,
             newPatchSet,
             mailMessage,
-            approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(),
+            approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals().stream()
+                .map(ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::patchSetApproval)
+                .collect(toImmutableSet()),
             Streams.concat(
                     oldRecipients.getReviewers().stream(),
                     reviewerAdditions.flattenResults(ReviewerOp.Result::addedReviewers).stream()
@@ -595,6 +597,7 @@
     return Optional.of(
         "The following approvals got outdated and were removed:\n"
             + approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals().stream()
+                .map(ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData::patchSetApproval)
                 .map(
                     outdatedApproval ->
                         String.format(
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/CopiedApprovalsInChangeMessageIT.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/CopiedApprovalsInChangeMessageIT.java
index f8cf5fd..2b1bef0 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/CopiedApprovalsInChangeMessageIT.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/api/change/CopiedApprovalsInChangeMessageIT.java
@@ -45,12 +45,29 @@
 import com.google.gerrit.extensions.common.ChangeInfo;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.approval.ApprovalCopier;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.approval.ApprovalsUtil;
+import com.google.gerrit.server.group.SystemGroupBackend;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.project.testing.TestLabels;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.util.AccountTemplateUtil;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.util.time.TimeUtil;
 import com.google.inject.Inject;
 import org.junit.Test;
 
+/**
+ * Tests to verify that copied/outdated approvals are included into the change message that is
+ * posted on patch set creation. Includes verifying that the copied/outdated approvals in the change
+ * message are correctly formatted.
+ *
+ * <p>Some of the tests only verify the correct formatting of the copied/outdated approvals in the
+ * change message that is done by {@link
+ * ApprovalsUtil#formatApprovalCopierResult(com.google.gerrit.server.approval.ApprovalCopier.Result,
+ * LabelTypes)}. This method does the formatting based on the inputs that it gets, but it doesn't do
+ * any verification of these inputs. This means it's possible to provide inputs that are
+ * inconsistent with the approval copying logic in {@link ApprovalCopier}. E.g. it's possible to
+ * provide "is:MAX" as a passing atom for a "Code-Review-1" vote and have "is:MAX" highlighted as
+ * passing in the message although the "Code-Review-1" vote doesn't match with "is:MAX". For easier
+ * readability the formatting tests avoid using such inconsistent input data, but it's not
+ * impossible that in some cases we made a mistake and the input data is inconsistent.
+ */
 public class CopiedApprovalsInChangeMessageIT extends AbstractDaemonTest {
   @Inject private ApprovalsUtil approvalsUtil;
   @Inject private ProjectOperations projectOperations;
@@ -98,7 +115,11 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (label type is missing)\n");
@@ -111,7 +132,11 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Outdated Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (label type is missing)\n");
   }
@@ -125,7 +150,11 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1\n");
@@ -141,7 +170,11 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Outdated Votes:\n* Code-Review+1\n");
   }
@@ -153,13 +186,17 @@
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX")));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", -2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
-        .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n");
+        .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review-2 (copy condition: \"**is:MIN** OR is:MAX\")\n");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -168,14 +205,21 @@
         new LabelTypes(
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
-                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX")));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
+                    /* copyCondition= */ "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE is:MAX")));
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE"))));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
-        .hasValue("Outdated Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n");
+        .hasValue(
+            "Outdated Votes:\n* Code-Review+2 (copy condition:"
+                + " \"changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE **is:MAX**\")\n");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -189,7 +233,11 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -208,7 +256,11 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             "Outdated Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (non-parseable copy condition: \"foo bar baz\")\n");
@@ -225,17 +277,22 @@
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
                         "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s"
-                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()), groupUuid));
   }
 
@@ -254,12 +311,17 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN", "is:MAX"))));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Outdated Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN"
+                    + " OR (is:MAX **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()), groupUuid));
   }
 
@@ -275,10 +337,15 @@
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
                         "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
 
     // Set 'user' as the current user in the request scope.
@@ -291,8 +358,8 @@
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s"
-                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()), groupUuid));
   }
 
@@ -313,7 +380,11 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN", "is:MAX"))));
 
     // Set 'user' as the current user in the request scope.
     // 'user' cannot see the Administrators group that is used in the copy condition.
@@ -325,7 +396,8 @@
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Outdated Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN"
+                    + " OR (is:MAX **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()), groupUuid));
   }
 
@@ -344,7 +416,11 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -371,7 +447,11 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
-            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval));
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())));
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
@@ -388,7 +468,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (label type is missing)\n");
@@ -401,7 +489,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -417,7 +513,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1, Code-Review+2 (label type is missing)\n");
@@ -433,7 +537,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1\n");
@@ -450,7 +562,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1\n* Verified+1\n");
@@ -466,7 +586,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1, Code-Review+2\n");
@@ -480,14 +608,22 @@
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX")));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
-        .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n");
+        .hasValue("Copied Votes:\n* Code-Review+2 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR **is:MAX**\")\n");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -498,39 +634,92 @@
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX"),
-                createLabelType(
-                    /* labelName= */ "Verified", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX")));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+                LabelType.builder(
+                        "Verified",
+                        ImmutableList.of(
+                            LabelValue.create((short) -1, "Fails"),
+                            LabelValue.create((short) 0, "No Vote"),
+                            LabelValue.create((short) 1, "Succeeds")))
+                    .setCopyCondition("is:MIN OR is:MAX")
+                    .build()));
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MAX"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             "Copied Votes:\n"
-                + "* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n"
-                + "* Verified+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n");
+                + "* Code-Review+2 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR **is:MAX**\")\n"
+                + "* Verified+1 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR **is:MAX**\")\n");
   }
 
   @Test
-  public void formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_noUserInPredicate()
-      throws Exception {
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_noUserInPredicate_samePassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
     LabelTypes labelTypes =
         new LabelTypes(
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
-                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:MIN OR is:MAX")));
+                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "changekind:REWORK")));
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("changekind:REWORK"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("changekind:REWORK"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             "Copied Votes:\n"
-                + "* Code-Review+1, Code-Review+2 (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR is:MAX\")\n");
+                + "* Code-Review+1, Code-Review+2 (copy condition: \"**changekind:REWORK**\")\n");
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_noUserInPredicate_differentPassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
+    LabelTypes labelTypes =
+        new LabelTypes(
+            ImmutableList.of(
+                createLabelType(
+                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review", /* copyCondition= */ "is:1 OR is:2")));
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
+    ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
+        ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:2"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:1")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:1"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:2"))),
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
+    assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
+        .hasValue(
+            "Copied Votes:\n"
+                + "* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: \"**is:1** OR is:2\")\n"
+                + "* Code-Review+2 (copy condition: \"is:1 OR **is:2**\")\n");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -545,7 +734,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -565,7 +762,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -587,7 +792,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -597,8 +810,9 @@
   }
 
   @Test
-  public void formatMultipleApprovals_sameVote_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate()
-      throws Exception {
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_sameVote_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate_samePassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
     String groupUuid =
         groupCache.get(AccountGroup.nameKey("Administrators")).get().getGroupUUID().get();
     LabelTypes labelTypes =
@@ -608,24 +822,86 @@
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
                         "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 2);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s, %s"
-                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s, %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
                 groupUuid));
   }
 
   @Test
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_sameVote_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate_differentPassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
+    String administratorsGroupUuid =
+        groupCache.get(AccountGroup.nameKey("Administrators")).get().getGroupUUID().get();
+    String registeredUsersGroupUuid = SystemGroupBackend.REGISTERED_USERS.get();
+    LabelTypes labelTypes =
+        new LabelTypes(
+            ImmutableList.of(
+                createLabelType(
+                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
+                    /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
+                        "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s) OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)",
+                        administratorsGroupUuid, registeredUsersGroupUuid))));
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 2);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
+    ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
+        ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", registeredUsersGroupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MIN", String.format("approverin:%s", administratorsGroupUuid))),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX",
+                        String.format("approverin:%s", administratorsGroupUuid),
+                        String.format("approverin:%s", registeredUsersGroupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
+    assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
+        .hasValue(
+            String.format(
+                "Copied Votes:\n"
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)"
+                    + " OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n"
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:MAX** approverin:%s)"
+                    + " OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
+                AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
+                administratorsGroupUuid,
+                registeredUsersGroupUuid,
+                AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
+                administratorsGroupUuid,
+                registeredUsersGroupUuid));
+  }
+
+  @Test
   public void formatMultipleApprovals_differentLabel_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate()
       throws Exception {
     String groupUuid =
@@ -641,18 +917,30 @@
                     /* labelName= */ "Verified",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
                         "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
-    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", -2);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid))),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:MAX", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
-                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n"
-                    + "* Verified+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + "* Code-Review-2 by %s (copy condition: \"**is:MIN**"
+                    + " OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n"
+                    + "* Verified+1 by %s (copy condition: \"is:MIN"
+                    + " OR (**is:MAX** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
                 groupUuid,
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
@@ -660,8 +948,9 @@
   }
 
   @Test
-  public void formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate()
-      throws Exception {
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate_samePassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
     String groupUuid =
         groupCache.get(AccountGroup.nameKey("Administrators")).get().getGroupUUID().get();
     LabelTypes labelTypes =
@@ -670,51 +959,122 @@
                 createLabelType(
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
-                        "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
+                        "is:MIN OR (is:ANY approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:ANY", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:ANY", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
                     + "* Code-Review+1 by %s, Code-Review+2 by %s"
-                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:ANY** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
                 groupUuid));
   }
 
   @Test
+  public void
+      formatMultipleApprovals_differentValue_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate_differentPassingAtoms()
+          throws Exception {
+    String groupUuid =
+        groupCache.get(AccountGroup.nameKey("Administrators")).get().getGroupUUID().get();
+    LabelTypes labelTypes =
+        new LabelTypes(
+            ImmutableList.of(
+                createLabelType(
+                    /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
+                    /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
+                        "is:MIN OR (is:1 approverin:%s) OR (is:2 approverin:%s)",
+                        groupUuid, groupUuid))));
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
+    PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
+    ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
+        ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:2", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN", "is:1")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:1", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN", "is:2"))),
+            /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
+    assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
+        .hasValue(
+            String.format(
+                "Copied Votes:\n"
+                    + "* Code-Review+1 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:1** **approverin:%s**)"
+                    + " OR (is:2 **approverin:%s**)\")\n"
+                    + "* Code-Review+2 by %s"
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:1 **approverin:%s**)"
+                    + " OR (**is:2** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
+                AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
+                groupUuid,
+                groupUuid,
+                AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
+                groupUuid,
+                groupUuid));
+  }
+
+  @Test
   public void formatMultipleApprovals_differentAndSameValue_withCopyCondition_withUserInPredicate()
       throws Exception {
     TestAccount user2 = accountCreator.user2();
-    String groupUuid =
-        groupCache.get(AccountGroup.nameKey("Administrators")).get().getGroupUUID().get();
+    String groupUuid = SystemGroupBackend.REGISTERED_USERS.get();
     LabelTypes labelTypes =
         new LabelTypes(
             ImmutableList.of(
                 createLabelType(
                     /* labelName= */ "Code-Review",
                     /* copyCondition= */ String.format(
-                        "is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
+                        "is:MIN OR (is:ANY approverin:%s)", groupUuid))));
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval1 = createPatchSetApproval(admin, "Code-Review", 2);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user2, "Code-Review", 1);
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval3 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
             /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
-                patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2, patchSetApproval3),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:ANY", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:ANY", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN")),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval3,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                        "is:ANY", String.format("approverin:%s", groupUuid)),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of("is:MIN"))),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
             String.format(
                 "Copied Votes:\n"
                     + "* Code-Review+1 by %s, %s, Code-Review+2 by %s"
-                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (is:MAX approverin:%s)\")\n",
+                    + " (copy condition: \"is:MIN OR (**is:ANY** **approverin:%s**)\")\n",
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user.id()),
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(user2.id()),
                 AccountTemplateUtil.getAccountTemplate(admin.id()),
@@ -737,7 +1097,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -769,7 +1137,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Verified", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -799,7 +1175,15 @@
     PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval2 = createPatchSetApproval(user, "Code-Review", 1);
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         ApprovalCopier.Result.create(
-            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(patchSetApproval1, patchSetApproval2),
+            /* copiedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of(
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval1,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of()),
+                ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData.create(
+                    patchSetApproval2,
+                    /* passingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of(),
+                    /* failingAtoms= */ ImmutableSet.of())),
             /* outdatedApprovals= */ ImmutableSet.of());
     assertThat(approvalsUtil.formatApprovalCopierResult(approvalCopierResult, labelTypes))
         .hasValue(
@@ -849,7 +1233,7 @@
                 + "\n"
                 + "Copied Votes:\n"
                 + "* Code-Review-2 (copy condition: \"changekind:NO_CHANGE"
-                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN\")\n"
+                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR **is:MIN**\")\n"
                 + "\n"
                 + "Outdated Votes:\n"
                 + "* Verified+1\n");
@@ -900,7 +1284,7 @@
                 + "\n"
                 + "Copied Votes:\n"
                 + "* Code-Review-2 (copy condition: \"changekind:NO_CHANGE"
-                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN\")\n"
+                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR **is:MIN**\")\n"
                 + "\n"
                 + "Outdated Votes:\n"
                 + "* Verified+1\n");
@@ -946,7 +1330,7 @@
                 + "\n"
                 + "Copied Votes:\n"
                 + "* Code-Review-2 (copy condition: \"changekind:NO_CHANGE"
-                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN\")\n"
+                + " OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR **is:MIN**\")\n"
                 + "\n"
                 + "Outdated Votes:\n"
                 + "* Verified+1\n");
diff --git a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/ApprovalCopierIT.java b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/ApprovalCopierIT.java
index 0d06946..379a712 100644
--- a/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/ApprovalCopierIT.java
+++ b/javatests/com/google/gerrit/acceptance/server/change/ApprovalCopierIT.java
@@ -17,18 +17,23 @@
 import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet.toImmutableSet;
 import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertAbout;
 import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
-import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.server.change.ApprovalCopierIT.PatchSetApprovalSubject.assertThatList;
-import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.server.change.ApprovalCopierIT.PatchSetApprovalSubject.hasTestId;
+import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.server.change.ApprovalCopierIT.ApprovalDataSubject.assertThat;
+import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.server.change.ApprovalCopierIT.ApprovalDataSubject.assertThatList;
+import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.server.change.ApprovalCopierIT.ApprovalDataSubject.hasTestId;
 import static com.google.gerrit.acceptance.testsuite.project.TestProjectUpdate.allowLabel;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.group.SystemGroupBackend.REGISTERED_USERS;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.project.testing.TestLabels.labelBuilder;
 import static com.google.gerrit.server.project.testing.TestLabels.value;
+import static com.google.gerrit.truth.ListSubject.elements;
 
 import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
 import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence;
 import com.google.common.truth.FailureMetadata;
+import com.google.common.truth.StandardSubjectBuilder;
+import com.google.common.truth.StringSubject;
 import com.google.common.truth.Subject;
+import com.google.common.truth.Truth8;
 import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.AbstractDaemonTest;
 import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.NoHttpd;
 import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.PushOneCommit;
@@ -43,6 +48,7 @@
 import com.google.gerrit.entities.PatchSetApproval;
 import com.google.gerrit.entities.RefNames;
 import com.google.gerrit.extensions.api.changes.ReviewInput;
+import com.google.gerrit.extensions.client.ChangeKind;
 import com.google.gerrit.extensions.restapi.RestApiException;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.approval.ApprovalCopier;
 import com.google.gerrit.server.query.change.ChangeData;
@@ -50,6 +56,7 @@
 import com.google.gerrit.truth.NullAwareCorrespondence;
 import com.google.inject.Inject;
 import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.Optional;
 import java.util.Set;
 import java.util.function.Predicate;
 import org.eclipse.jgit.lib.Repository;
@@ -71,6 +78,24 @@
 
   @Before
   public void setup() throws Exception {
+    // Overwrite "Code-Review" label that is inherited from All-Projects.
+    try (ProjectConfigUpdate u = updateProject(project)) {
+      LabelType.Builder codeReview =
+          labelBuilder(
+                  LabelId.CODE_REVIEW,
+                  value(2, "Looks good to me, approved"),
+                  value(1, "Looks good to me, but someone else must approve"),
+                  value(0, "No score"),
+                  value(-1, "I would prefer this is not submitted as is"),
+                  value(-2, "This shall not be submitted"))
+              .setCopyCondition(
+                  String.format(
+                      "changekind:%s OR changekind:%s OR is:MIN",
+                      ChangeKind.NO_CHANGE, ChangeKind.TRIVIAL_REBASE.name()));
+      u.getConfig().upsertLabelType(codeReview.build());
+      u.save();
+    }
+
     // Add Verified label.
     try (ProjectConfigUpdate u = updateProject(project)) {
       LabelType.Builder verified =
@@ -153,6 +178,18 @@
         .containsExactly(
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet1Id, admin.id(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, 2),
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet1Id, user.id(), LabelId.VERIFIED, 1));
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject codeReviewApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, admin.id());
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject
+        .hasFailingAtomsThat()
+        .containsExactly("changekind:NO_CHANGE", "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE", "is:MIN");
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject verifiedApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(), LabelId.VERIFIED, user.id());
+    verifiedApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+    verifiedApprovalSubject.hasFailingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -176,6 +213,18 @@
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet2Id, admin.id(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, -2),
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet2Id, user.id(), LabelId.VERIFIED, -1));
     assertThatList(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals()).isEmpty();
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject codeReviewApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, admin.id());
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject
+        .hasFailingAtomsThat()
+        .containsExactly("changekind:NO_CHANGE", "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE");
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject verifiedApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals(), LabelId.VERIFIED, user.id());
+    verifiedApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
+    verifiedApprovalSubject.hasFailingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -230,6 +279,30 @@
         .containsExactly(
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet1Id, user.id(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, 1),
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet1Id, admin.id(), LabelId.VERIFIED, 1));
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject copiedCodeReviewApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, admin.id());
+    copiedCodeReviewApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
+    copiedCodeReviewApprovalSubject
+        .hasFailingAtomsThat()
+        .containsExactly("changekind:NO_CHANGE", "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE");
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject copiedVerifiedApprovalSubject =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals(), LabelId.VERIFIED, user.id());
+    copiedVerifiedApprovalSubject.hasPassingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
+    copiedVerifiedApprovalSubject.hasFailingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject outdatedCodeReviewApprovalSubject1 =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, user.id());
+    outdatedCodeReviewApprovalSubject1.hasPassingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+    outdatedCodeReviewApprovalSubject1
+        .hasFailingAtomsThat()
+        .containsExactly("changekind:NO_CHANGE", "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE", "is:MIN");
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject outdatedVerifiedApprovalSubject1 =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(), LabelId.VERIFIED, admin.id());
+    outdatedVerifiedApprovalSubject1.hasPassingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+    outdatedVerifiedApprovalSubject1.hasFailingAtomsThat().containsExactly("is:MIN");
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -275,6 +348,11 @@
         .comparingElementsUsing(hasTestId())
         .containsExactly(
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet1Id, admin.id(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, -2));
+
+    ApprovalDataSubject codeReviewApprovalSubject1 =
+        assertThat(approvalCopierResult.outdatedApprovals(), LabelId.CODE_REVIEW, admin.id());
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject1.hasPassingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
+    codeReviewApprovalSubject1.hasFailingAtomsThat().isEmpty();
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -347,12 +425,14 @@
     ApprovalCopier.Result approvalCopierResult =
         invokeApprovalCopierForCurrentPatchSet(
             r.getChange().getId(), /* expectedCurrentPatchSetNum= */ 2);
-    ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> copiedApprovals = approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals();
-    assertThatList(filter(copiedApprovals, PatchSetApproval::copied))
+    ImmutableSet<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> copiedApprovals =
+        approvalCopierResult.copiedApprovals();
+    assertThatList(filter(copiedApprovals, approval -> approval.patchSetApproval().copied()))
         .comparingElementsUsing(hasTestId())
         .containsExactly(
             PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(patchSet2Id, user.id(), LabelId.VERIFIED, -1));
-    assertThatList(filter(copiedApprovals, psa -> !psa.copied())).isEmpty();
+    assertThatList(filter(copiedApprovals, approval -> !approval.patchSetApproval().copied()))
+        .isEmpty();
   }
 
   private void vote(String changeId, TestAccount testAccount, String label, int value)
@@ -362,8 +442,9 @@
     requestScopeOperations.setApiUser(admin.id());
   }
 
-  private ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> filter(
-      Set<PatchSetApproval> approvals, Predicate<PatchSetApproval> filter) {
+  private ImmutableSet<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> filter(
+      Set<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvals,
+      Predicate<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> filter) {
     return approvals.stream().filter(filter).collect(toImmutableSet());
   }
 
@@ -378,20 +459,75 @@
     }
   }
 
-  public static class PatchSetApprovalSubject extends Subject {
-    public static Correspondence<PatchSetApproval, PatchSetApprovalTestId> hasTestId() {
-      return NullAwareCorrespondence.transforming(PatchSetApprovalTestId::create, "has test ID");
+  public static class ApprovalDataSubject extends Subject {
+    public static Correspondence<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData, PatchSetApprovalTestId>
+        hasTestId() {
+      return NullAwareCorrespondence.transforming(
+          approvalData -> PatchSetApprovalTestId.create(approvalData.patchSetApproval()),
+          "has test ID");
     }
 
+    public static ApprovalDataSubject assertThat(
+        ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData approvalData) {
+      return assertAbout(approvalDatas()).that(approvalData);
+    }
+
+    public static ApprovalDataSubject assertThat(
+        ImmutableSet<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalDatas,
+        String labelId,
+        Account.Id accountId) {
+      Optional<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalDataForLabelAndAccount =
+          approvalDatas.stream()
+              .filter(
+                  approvalData ->
+                      approvalData.patchSetApproval().label().equals(labelId)
+                          && approvalData.patchSetApproval().accountId().equals(accountId))
+              .findAny();
+      Truth8.assertThat(approvalDataForLabelAndAccount).isPresent();
+      return assertAbout(approvalDatas()).that(approvalDataForLabelAndAccount.get());
+    }
+
+    public static ListSubject<ApprovalDataSubject, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+        assertThatList(ImmutableSet<ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData> approvalDatas) {
+      return ListSubject.assertThat(approvalDatas.asList(), approvalDatas());
+    }
+
+    private static Factory<ApprovalDataSubject, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData>
+        approvalDatas() {
+      return ApprovalDataSubject::new;
+    }
+
+    private final ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData approvalData;
+
+    private ApprovalDataSubject(
+        FailureMetadata metadata, ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData approvalData) {
+      super(metadata, approvalData);
+      this.approvalData = approvalData;
+    }
+
+    public ListSubject<StringSubject, String> hasPassingAtomsThat() {
+      return check("passingAtoms()")
+          .about(elements())
+          .that(approvalData().passingAtoms().asList(), StandardSubjectBuilder::that);
+    }
+
+    public ListSubject<StringSubject, String> hasFailingAtomsThat() {
+      return check("failingAtoms()")
+          .about(elements())
+          .that(approvalData().failingAtoms().asList(), StandardSubjectBuilder::that);
+    }
+
+    private ApprovalCopier.Result.PatchSetApprovalData approvalData() {
+      isNotNull();
+      return approvalData;
+    }
+  }
+
+  public static class PatchSetApprovalSubject extends Subject {
     public static PatchSetApprovalSubject assertThat(PatchSetApproval patchSetApproval) {
       return assertAbout(patchSetApprovals()).that(patchSetApproval);
     }
 
-    public static ListSubject<PatchSetApprovalSubject, PatchSetApproval> assertThatList(
-        ImmutableSet<PatchSetApproval> patchSetApprovals) {
-      return ListSubject.assertThat(patchSetApprovals.asList(), patchSetApprovals());
-    }
-
     private static Factory<PatchSetApprovalSubject, PatchSetApproval> patchSetApprovals() {
       return PatchSetApprovalSubject::new;
     }